<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Thinking Allowed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gcummins.com/philosophy/2010/02/no-thinking-allowed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gcummins.com/philosophy/2010/02/no-thinking-allowed/</link>
	<description>Challenging your worldview</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:24:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nunya</title>
		<link>http://gcummins.com/philosophy/2010/02/no-thinking-allowed/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Nunya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 02:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcummins.com/philosophy/?p=60#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Many modern Christians shame the healthy heritage of intellectual giants such as Aquinas, Descartes, Augustine, Lewis, etc...
You don&#039;t have to be able to prove your faith for it to be valid (if you could fully prove it it would then cease to be faith), but you must be able to defend, justify, and reconcile it or it becomes blind dogmatic orthodoxy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many modern Christians shame the healthy heritage of intellectual giants such as Aquinas, Descartes, Augustine, Lewis, etc&#8230;<br />
You don&#8217;t have to be able to prove your faith for it to be valid (if you could fully prove it it would then cease to be faith), but you must be able to defend, justify, and reconcile it or it becomes blind dogmatic orthodoxy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

